IT Staff Convention 2008:Bare Bones Videoconferencing: From My Faculty's Desktop to Yours

From Provider Notes

Jump to: navigation, search

Bare Bones Videoconferencing: From My Faculty's Desktop to Yours

  • Moderator: Donald Huesman, Wharton
  • Notes: Dan Dougherty, Information Systems and Computing

Contents

Don's intro (Wharton Computing)

- Ip based video conferencing experience- Speakers from remote locations

  • Interested in Sharing war stories, trade offs, applications for Video Conferencing
  • Gaven: SAS, Former life: High def in previous experinece; lightweight? w/ friends, family
  • James: screen sharing current project. Intent real time educations "goto meeting" with PowerPoint presentations w/ fixed camera for room interaction
  • Adobe Connect: Dave Sidel on video display w/ Video Chat, fuzzy audio reply; Sound is always a battle
  • Three General Areas of IP-based Video Technology:
    • IP-based Video conferencing
    • Rich Media Format web conferencing
    • Web-based broadcasting

General Theme: How to w/o spending a lot of money

  • Expensive solution: "Wharton Direct" $100,000/session via satelite feed; too much!
  • Shawn (sas): s/w vs h/w echo cancelation; Hardware not cheap, complicated. Managing audio is a general issue -not just IP video, web conferencing issue
    • Cheap easy to use solutions: mbox small speaker -USP w/ h/w echo cancellation. Clear-one acqu-mikes another, can be chained together
  • (med) What's real cheap? successfully?
  • Phil: formerly lots of desktop sharing. video cameras collect dust.
  • Ed, SAS; currently interviewing for positions (diff countries) via Video conferences; how to use technology for students w/ language learning, interacting
  • Darco (Wharton), need ease of use..., compatible, quick to set up, remote.

--PennLive account; w/Windows messenger

  1. Rich media format

Adobe Connect, server based, not bare bones, s/w license $10,000, flash based, no plugin. Allows compose multiple screens for: feed, desktop (local), remote questions, conference. Four classes together with WebX to bridge classes. capture data for later presentations.

  • Marco (Wharton) WebX: audio is critical w/ time sensitive. Not necessary to see each other. Video most complex.
  • Problem: Video conferences w/telephone, thought technical users, not able to master mute button. Lecture mode to cancel live feed. Skills not there yet. interject: Operator needs to shield users from technical details. Test runs, cruses. Hide technical details for conference content delivery. Setting up user expectations.
  • Bridge phone into video field.
  • Skype: class room to class room, mikes and video feeds. Interviews, video conferencing,
  • preparation: expectations for technology. Demo important to set expectations.

--Q; Record sessions to archive? Not Skype, yes iChat. XMeeting yes, PVX no, Yes for Audio w/ Skype with 3rd party application

  • Adobe Connect: Always On Meeting- Typed or spoken always available. Able to continue.

--ProWiki topics w/ video conferences

Audio topics

  • Echo, volume per/user, microphone. More mikes more problems. Best environment: Push to talk- wired mike activation needs to hold button down. eliminates problems, cancelation issues; Self policing.
  • ClearOne: Rack to one small box on tower.
  • Chase; Law school; seating microphones; individual lines out and balancing. Algorthm for sorting mike volume.
  • ClearOne takes care of gates, echo cancelation, other details; Standard check sheet: easy planning, management

Ease of use

  • Logitec headsets= USB
  • Horror: heard guests speakers...Principals were in 80s. Planning should have included hand holding; would improve sound. All different situations.

Cheaper

Nokea w/web cam, linux based. Send unit to remote location. Quality not as good. W/Skype may improve

  • Quicktime: wirecast will switch
  • MS MeetingSpace: Companies Polycom, Tamberg: making integrated products. MS multiple products

in parallel.

  • Anywhere else on campus for info on conferencing; collaboration services onsite.
  • University at point of recommended systems w/ camera, video.
  • Free application require lots of details, open ports, multiple testings.

Success Stories

  • Wharton: With Adobe Connect: had living case study blood diamonds problems w/ jewelry and back story ugly. Very expensive. Saved and can be used for teaching purposes later.
  • Demo not rolled out yet. Goal for one-way teaching remotely. GoTo meeting via Citrix PowerPoint presentation w/ microscopic slides. Resolution, refresh rate great. See demo on line: URL online. Client liked it and is moving foward. one-way video directional: phone for audio, PowerPoint presentation via browser. Got momentum w/ faculty/client. Phone audio good enough w/o IP.
  • Bunch of people via WebX but able to add users via cell phone.

Penn Resources

IT Staff Convention 2008: Session Overviews

Personal tools